Wednesday, July 28, 2010

Aru You Kidding Me? Minister!

Hantu Laut

Are you kidding me?

Big drop in FDI, cause we are getting quality not quantity investments says Minister of International Trade and Industry Mustapha Mohammed here.

“We are beginning to attract quality investments,” he said.

“It doesn’t mean that if it’s RM1 billion investment you generate lots of benefit for the country.

Sorry! Minister! Couldn't agree with you, not if you care about the macroeconomic of this country.We need both, but quantity more.

“It could be only RM10 million but, in terms of job opportunities, there are more job opportunities that pay higher wages.” he said.

Are we going for more labour intensive industries? How could labour intensive be paying higher wages?

Wow! I wonder which book of economic tells him small investments can provide bigger employment, pay higher wages and generate lots of benefit for the country.If that is the case why don't we just stick to growing more oil palm and set up more garment factories.

He gave the example of a “quality” local company worth RM200 million employing 1,500 graduates with a starting pay of RM4,000 per month.

That translates into a staggering RM6,000,000 monthly salaries just for the graduate employees alone.Surely, there must be other category of employees like clerks,office boys,drivers,coffee lady and so on.He did not mention what the company's business is.If it is a manufacturing concern than there must be factory workers on the floor.They need to be paid too, unless those graduates are the factory workers.

The graduates total payroll in a year would come to RM72 million excluding other benefits and salaries of other employees.What about other recurring expenses?

Need I go any further to tell you why our FDI and economy are in trouble.

When you have minister like this going round the world telling foreign investors we want quality not quantity investments and himself can't even do simple arithmetic let alone understand the intricacies of economic terms, what would you expect to get in return? A runaway success to woo foreign investors or a botched mission because our minister sounds unconvincing.?

Maybe, Najib should recall Rafidah Aziz. The lady would have done a far better job than our 'quality man.'

The example he gave is subjective.At the end of the day what is most important is the value added product, the bottom line.Size of investment does play a major part to the kind of quality and quantity of the products or services.

There again, we are talking about the drop in total FDI value which means there is lack of confidence by foreign investors putting their money here.It's simple economic.The more money you put in the greater would be the economic output, unless the minister has found a new economic theory that says otherwise.

In 2009 our FDI plunged 81 per cent.Not only new FDI avoided us like a leper, existing foreign investments in the country are not expanding their businesses.

If thing can go wrong it will go wrong, most unfortunate, when it should not be so, even domestic investments are moving at snail pace.

MITI must not count the eggs in its basket but ask whether the eggs can hatch to produce more chicks.Not all approved investments get to the ground.They look good on papers but failed to turn into economic generators.

The measure of FDI is confidence.It is confidence in the political stability and fiscal policies of the nation that draws foreign investors to any country.These two top foreign investor's wish list before other considerations like the availability of suitable labour force, infrastructures and other logistics are taken into account.

Obviously, Malaysia is suffering from lack of confidence in its political stability and unflattering fiscal policies.

We have three serious headaches, political instability, a siege fiscal policy and brain drain.

Prime Minister Najib was not able to implement his New Economic Model (NEM) due to strong opposition from the rent seekers in UMNO and Perkasa under the pretext of..... Malays still need help.

The government have had the NEP close to 40 years, one should ask how come there are still many poor Malays.Isn't that telling how much the NEP had been abused.If the Malays can't progress in the past 40 years what makes the clouts think they can in the next 40 years if the mentality do not change.

As Malays I think we should be self-critical and self examine ourselves where we have gone wrong instead of putting the blame on other races for our misfortunes.Likewise, the non-Malays should not question what's enshrined in the constitution, there is always room for fine tuning the fine print by constitutional means.Spurting racist remarks are not going to help but would only worsen the problem.

We certainly don't want to be called 'land of the blind'.We are losing our best brains to other parts of the world because they can't see what best for them in this country.

We produced graduates by the thousands but the private sector shied away from employing them.Why? We, probably know the answer to that.Many end up joining the civil service, that has ballooned the civil service to over a million employees, probably, making it the biggest in the world and a huge burden on the budget.

The economic indicators looked grim and would continue to slide if the government do nothing to arrest the negative perceptions and start innovating a strong investment climate.

Our foreign exchange reserves felled by 25 per cent in 2009 which means we incurred huge forex losses and exodus of money in 2009.The human and capital flight will have long term effect on the nation's progress.

When the best of money and the best of brain abandoned the country than there must be something seriously wrong.You will not see the effect immediately but a gradual decline as more and more leave for greener pastures and the safe havens.In the first eight months of 2009 over 200,000 Malaysians migrated.

This is an English proverb that says "you might as well be hung for a sheep as for a lamb"

Najib's NEM can only succeed if he subscribes to the meaning of this proverb.It means since you have gone some of the way you might as well go all the way, the punishment is the same.

As I have said many times before, Najib needs a major cabinet reshuffle.Too many dead woods and non-performers in his administration.

Unfortunately, adding insult to injury, many of his ministers are not talking sense.

Tuesday, July 27, 2010

Mr Big Spender's Duel in "Who Is Richer", Spending Other People's Money

Hantu Laut

The heat is on who could spend more on downing bottles of Cristal champagne in one night of orgasmic drinking spree in the slimy world of the filthy rich and famous.

Now, our Mr Big Spender has roped in his brother to help spend the money he couldn't spend fast enough, rumoured to be courtesy of the royal household of the Al-Nahyan family of Abu Dhabi whose sons went to the same university as Mr Big Spender.His other mates at Wharton was rumoured to be Najib's son.

Is he the front man and Mr Fixer for his rich friends? That may soon change when his very rich friends decide to trade places with him.See the movie "Trading Places" starring Dan Aykroyd and Eddie Murphy and you would get my drift.



Zhen Low, the younger brother of Mr Big Spender Jho Low was involved in a competition with Winston Fisher, a New York property developer to see who could order more bottles of Cristal champagne.They two tycoons spent a staggering 1.8 million pound sterling in one night display of exhibited wealth.



















Cherubic Jho Low and Winston Fisher were having a whale of a time pouring their money down the gutter to impress the girls.Paris Hilton former boyfriend Doug Reinhart who happened to be in town gave up after spending on 4 gigantic bottles, no match for our new free spending Malaysian billionaire.

Scene at the Les Caves du Roy nightclub in St Tropez.






















































The princes ?







































Even Joan Collins who came to town felt poor and humbled by our "Maggie Mee" billionaire.



















More images here.

The Worst Of The Worst. Who Are They? Part II

Bad dude dictators and general coconut heads.

BY GEORGE B.N. AYITTEY

1. KIM JONG IL of North Korea: A personality-cult-cultivating isolationist with a taste for fine French cognac, Kim has pauperized his people, allowed famine to run rampant, and thrown hundreds of thousands in prison camps (where as many as 200,000 languish today) -- all while spending his country's precious few resources on a nuclear program.
Years in power: 16

2. ROBERT MUGABE of Zimbabwe: A liberation "hero" in the struggle for independence who has since transformed himself into a murderous despot, Mugabe has arrested and tortured the opposition, squeezed his economy into astounding negative growth and billion-percent inflation, and funneled off a juicy cut for himself using currency manipulation and offshore accounts.
Years in power: 30

3. THAN SHWE of Burma: A heartless military coconut head whose sole consuming preoccupation is power, Shwe has decimated the opposition with arrests and detentions, denied humanitarian aid to his people after 2008's devastating Cyclone Nargis, and thrived off a black market economy of natural gas exports. This vainglorious general bubbling with swagger sports a uniform festooned with self-awarded medals, but he is too cowardly to face an honest ballot box.
Years in power: 18

4. OMAR HASSAN AL-BASHIR of Sudan: A megalomaniac zealot who has quashed all opposition, Bashir is responsible for the deaths of millions of Sudanese and has been indicted by the International Criminal Court for war crimes. Bashir's Arab militias, the janjaweed, may have halted their massacres in Darfur, but they continue to traffic black Sudanese as slaves (Bashir himself has been accused of having had several at one point).
Years in power: 21

Continue reading.

Source:Foreign Policy

Monday, July 26, 2010

The Worst Of The Worst. Who Are They?

The Worst of the Worst

Bad dude dictators and general coconut heads.

BY GEORGE B.N. AYITTEY


A continent away from Kyrgyzstan, Africans like myself cheered this spring as a coalition of opposition groups ousted the country's dictator, President Kurmanbek Bakiyev. "One coconut down, 39 more to harvest!" we shouted. There are at least 40 dictators around the world today, and approximately 1.9 billion people live under the grip of the 23 autocrats on this list alone. There are plenty of coconuts to go around.

The cost of all that despotism has been stultifying. Millions of lives have been lost, economies have collapsed, and whole states have failed under brutal repression. And what has made it worse is that the world is in denial. The end of the Cold War was also supposed to be the "End of History" -- when democracy swept the world and repression went the way of the dinosaurs. Instead, Freedom House reports that only 60 percent of the world's countries are democratic -- far more than the 28 percent in 1950, but still not much more than a majority. And many of those aren't real democracies at all, ruled instead by despots in disguise while the world takes their freedom for granted. As for the rest, they're just left to languish.

Although all dictators are bad in their own way, there's one insidious aspect of despotism that is most infuriating and galling to me: the disturbing frequency with which many despots, as in Kyrgyzstan, began their careers as erstwhile "freedom fighters" who were supposed to have liberated their people. Back in 2005, Bakiyev rode the crest of the so-called Tulip Revolution to oust the previous dictator. So familiar are Africans with this phenomenon that we have another saying: "We struggle very hard to remove one cockroach from power, and the next rat comes to do the same thing. Haba!" Darn!

I call these revolutionaries-turned-tyrants "crocodile liberators," joining the ranks of other fine specimens: the Swiss bank socialists who force the people to pay for economic losses while stashing personal gains abroad, the quack revolutionaries who betray the ideals that brought them to power, and the briefcase bandits who simply pillage and steal. Here's my list of the world's worst dictators. I have ranked them based on ignoble qualities of perfidy, cultural betrayal, and economic devastation. If this account of their evils makes you cringe, just imagine living under their rule.

Who are they ?
Starting tomorrow. The World's worst dictators.