Sarawak Report:The Bitching And Ranting Of A Sore Loser

Hantu Laut

Why don't you screw your own government for not listening to your demand, or better still screw the royal couple for bringing shame to your country.

William and Kate have also visited Soloman Islands which had suffered serious environmental damage and degradation of its forests due to unsustainable and illegal logging activities and corruptions, but you are completely silent on the Solomon but keep barking like a mad dog at Sabah and Sarawak Chief Ministers with your skewed and twisted political agenda.

Are you really concerned about the environment or you have prostituted yourself to the Malaysian oppositions. The answer is obvious.

You have put pen to paper but did not pen your name to the story.

Ain't, life a bitch ! When you have to hide behind the face of anonymity, pretending and deceiving people into believing that you are an accredited news portal, ostensibly you are not,  you are merely a blog with one political agenda.....placarding Sabah and Sarawak Chief Ministers with lies, half-truths and untruths for the sake of the oppositions.

Read the endless bitching of an English woman who has made Malaysian politics her regular meals.

Sabah Trip Goes Tits Up!

A story about topless sunbathing has dominated international coverage of the William and Kate Sabah trip.

It means the destruction of the jungle of Borneo, caused by corruption in Malaysia’s highest political circles, has been ignored in favour of a lot of fuss about a ‘Peeping Tom’ photographer.

One person who will be relieved is Chief Minister Musa Aman.  Sabah may not have got the international attention it might have, but then nor did his corrupt practices.

William and Kate were whisked to a canopy walk in Danum Valley, where they also photographed captive orang utans, and then whisked away again.

Thanks to the destruction of most of Sabah’s natural heritage that is all most tourists get to do in Sabah anyway.

The UK’s Guardiannewspaper had reflected on the situation in Sabah earlier in the week, drawing attention to the concerns that the Royal visit would do less to help save what is left of Borneo than bolster the corrupt regime of the greedy man who has been driving the deforestation.

The top international NGO Global Witness likewise has condemned the visit and asked Prince William to consider the real causes of deforestation, which is the corruption of ministers.Read more.

Sarawak Report, your trusted source of lies, untruths and falsifications.

Anwar:Another Mother Of All Lies!

Hantu Laut

Happy Malaysia Day!

Let's rewind back to 16 Sept 2008 the day the nation was told the mother of all lies, the formation of a new Federal government by Anwar Ibrahim through what he claimed massive defection of MPs from BN, mostly from Sabah. 

Today, exactly four years later, another mother of all lies is being told by the same man, a promise to the Labuan people to build a bridge from mainland Sabah to Labuan, if PR takes Putrajaya. The story here. 

You don't have to be a genius to conclude that building a bridge is not a viable proposition. Labuan is only 87.52 Km2 with a population of around 60,000 people and one-third of the population transients. 

What kind of economic output that Labuan is likely to produce to justify such huge capital investment which cannot generate sufficient traffic to generate reasonable rate of return. At current cost of construction the bridge pay back period would be well over 100 years. That money have better use upgrading Sabah poor road infrastructure than serving the interests of a little dot in the sea and 60,000 inhabitants that lack resourcefulness. 

He promised the people of Labuan on his recent visit there and brought along with him a long lost son of Labuan who looks as alien as a Martian to the Labuan people, to be a PR candidate for Labuan in the 13th GE as reported here. 

Menudin seated right next to Anwar looking uneasy.

Can Ibrahim Menudin win Labuan for Anwar? 

........but with Anwar you'll never know, it may be Menudin today and someone else tomorrow.

Menudin, has one disadvantage, not many people in Labuan know he is from Labuan considering his long hiatus from the island.

Why is Malaysia trying to spot gay schoolchildren?

So the Malaysian government has finally enlightened us all as to how to identify the gay child in your classroom. In an effort to "curb the problem of homosexuality", the Teacher's Foundation of Malaysia is holding seminars where parents are instructed on how to identify gay kids. Homosexual boys "may wear tight, light clothes and carry large handbags". Lesbians are apparently easy to spot, as they like to "hang out and sleep in the company of other girls". So, um, all girls then.

How can the Malaysian authorities be so stupid? All young gays know that large handbags are completely over. At International HQ, new recruits are instructed to be fashion forward. We had the baby Karl Lagerfeld look in the 80s, tiny combats and DM boots in the 90s, and the same decade's indie moment came when the Marilyn Manson look become popular (instead of just Marilyn). Now in 2012 we are going for the butch look. Clearly some baby gays are still into accessories but most gays will be wearing tracksuits and trying to look butch.

Of course, it is easy to scoff at Malaysia's frightening campaign (try looking for the gays like Gareth Thomas, you know, the ones who play rugby) but we in the UK are not in a position to take the moral high ground.

In the UK we seem unable to even countenance the idea that children may have some kind of burgeoning sexual orientation, and even worse, that a small number of them may be lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender. Sssh, don't talk about it; you'll make them all start having sex!

I knew I was different from the other boys (yes, zzz) when I was four or five, and actually realised I was a bona fide homosexual at the age of 10. I wasn't worried about the size of my handbag or about having sex, I was too busy crying myself to sleep, trying to change, wondering if my parents would abandon me and whether I should get married to a woman or just kill myself.

I want to sneer at Malaysia for the mental torture they will be inflicting on kids (and their parents), but we all need to wake up to what therapist Dr Joe Kort calls the "covert cultural child abuse" that is being inflicted on all LGBT kids in every single classroom in every single school in the UK, the US and across the world.Read more.

Homosexuality: Nature Or Nurture?

Hantu Laut

It is the most shocking, unfounded, misinformed and convoluted finding of a bunch of amateurish sociobiologists.

The Education Dept crass guideline on how to identify homosexuals is a complete sham.  

It's sending wrong signals to young and unadulterated minds of children who follow blindly the stupid description that can do more harm than good, stigmatised anyone fitting the description.


The moron who designates such ridiculous prescription should be hung by the balls.

Read the quack's design  here  on how to spot a homosexual!

Are we teaching and promoting hate crime?

Homosexuality, as we all know, is as old as the oldest profession and since ancient time have been contentious issues in society. 

There are two schools of thought on homosexualities. Are they innate or natural, which means existing in some people since birth that make sexual orientation not a choice, or are they unnatural and a matter of conditioning and a matter of choice?

Many still hold the view that homosexuality, like all social habits, is a matter of choice.

Do you hold that view or are you one of those who believe it is nature that plays greater role in the making of a homosexual person? 

Read the article below 

Homosexuality:Nature or Nurture ?

Although the term is new, discussions about sexuality in general, and same-sex attraction in particular, have occasioned philosophical discussion ranging from Plato’s Symposium. However, we still cannot say for sure whether homosexuality, and hence also heterosexuality and bisexuality, is socially constructed or purely driven by biological forces.

 Many homosexuals argue that they have not chosen their condition, but that they were born that way. It is making homosexual behavior natural for them. However, because something was not chosen does not mean it was inborn. Some desires are acquired or strengthened by habituation and conditioning instead of by conscious choice of some person. For example, no one chooses to be an alcoholic, but one can become habituated to alcohol, so just as one can acquire alcoholic desires without consciously choosing them, so one may acquire homosexual desires, by engaging in homosexual fantasies or behavior.Read more.