The article here says former Prime Minister Mahathir Mohammad denies he is anti-Christian.
Does speaking his mind on the hypothesis that the WTC (World Trade Centre) was brought down by controlled demolition and the Bush's administration was complicit in the attacks makes him anti-Christians?
If you believe in Anwar's claim of trumped-up charges you would believe in anything.You would also believe George Bush is a saint and America is incapable of doing bad things and that Obama, as promised, would close down Guantanamo Bay and cease all hostilities against the Afghan and Iraqi people.
Guantanamo is still there and the war has not stopped but heightened.More US troops are going to Afghanistan to finish off the Talibans.Can they?
If I live under a coconut shell without windows to the world wouldn't I believe in anything shoved down my throat.Just like the poor helpless geese force fed just to make some frogs fulfill their discerning palate eating their foie gras.
Mahathir's antagonists have a field day reading between the lines making all kinds of negative assumptions of his statements.None of his statements have been lacking in scrutiny, every words he says, even in the righteous of sense would have negative connotation by his invidious antagonists.Then there are always those who have adapted to kissing America's arses come what may and have a basic fundmental disorder of thinking might is right and that the control demolition conspiracy theory is a crock of shit.
Where is Saddam's WMD (weapon of mass destruction) so claimed by George Bush and Tony Blair to justify the invasion of Iraq?
The control demolition conspiracy theory is not Mahathir's alone.There are considerable followings in the US that believe in the conspiracy.
Proponents, such as physicist Steven E.Jones, architect Richard Gage, software engineer Jim Hoffman, and theologian David Ray Griffin, argue that the aircraft impacts and resulting fires could not have weakened the buildings sufficiently to initiate a catastrophic collapse, and that the buildings would not have collapsed completely, nor at the speeds that they did, without additional energy involved to weaken their structures. Jones has presented the hypothesis that thermite or super-thermite was used to demolish the buildings. Read the full text here.
Anyone, other than willing victims of America's propaganda would have come to the same conclusion.How come three buildings collapsed in exactly same manner?
Watch the short video
Watch or download the full length video here.
The same group of people who believe in Anwar's claim of trumped-up charges believe that America is incapable of such heinous crime and that Mahathir is a racist,anti Jews and anti Christian also believe that Anwar is infallible.
They are never wrong.Only those not with them are wrong.