Hantu Laut
The scandalous tape is now the 'Sword of Damocle' hanging over both Anwar and Najib's head.Whose head it shall pierce depends on the result of the examination of the tape.The outcome of whether the tape is fake or not will decide the fate of these two men.
However, Anwar has far better chance in surviving the onslaught because he is a better liar and actor than Najib.Even if found authentic and untempered with, Anwar would still insist it is a fake and the result of the police investigation cannot be accepted because the police are running dogs of the government and faked the report and sadly for Najib the whole Pakatan mob and blurry-eyed Malaysians would be behind Anwar even if they have slight suspicion he is guilty.
Without Anwar the road to Putrajaya would become a bridge too far for Pakatan, so they will accept either way, guilty or otherwise.
That's why it is imperative that the tape must be given to an independent and reputable video forensic experts of world recognition.
In the case of Najib, if it was a fake, even if he had no prior knowledge or had no hand in it, he would still be dead meat and worse, in the court of public opinion he would be considered guilty.
Looking at Anwar's body language in his recent press conference there is 80 percent chance the video could be authentic. The watch would be the most reliable material witness complicit to the whole affair.With its serial number it would be easy to trace the ownership, unless the police is incompetent.
The whole nation is waiting in anticipation.
Although, I am not a fan of Anwar, for his sake, I hope I was wrong.
8 comments:
You sound like Dr Pornthip-
"Looking at Anwar's body language in his recent press conference there is 80 percent chance the video could be authentic"
but while Dr Pornthip is a world-renowned forensic expert, are you a body language expert?
sri hartamas
sri hartamas,
Yes, I have a master in Zoology and Psychology.Is that good enough for you.Dr Phrontip studied fake forensic science.
You pun pakar body language! Memang betul hantu!
Bolih percaya ke dengan hantu! Agama apa saudara ni?
Bro,
You said ".. Anuar is a better liar than Najib.."
Are you saying "Najib Tun Razak is a liar"?
abdooss,
Don't kid yourself.All politicians lied when it is convenient to do so.
Anonymous,
Agama shaitan! Bodoh!
NOTE: First,I have not seen the video,and have no such desire to watch it - not because the oh-so-sudden watching porn is 'haram' (as if!) but grandpa porn is so 1990s. Therefore, I am writing based on what I've read.
Anwaristas - The Rakyat and I applaud your determination, efforts and tenacity at vehemently denying Anwar's involvement. At this point of time - while waiting and pondering on the authenticity of the recording - allegedly Anwar (or someone who's a spitting image of Anwar or James Cameron/Michael Bay-ish incredible special effect team) has been seen by some, err priviledged people, re-enacting kamasutra (parts of it anyway) in Lanson's Place on 21st February 2011. Before you hurl and scream 'bitch' at me - the operative word here is allegedly.
From the way I've been reading this fiasco and how passionately people are talking about this - factoring in the he says/she says type of blogs written about the allegedly Anwar's acting-debut plus skills, it has a feel that as if this video have been seen by the masses. Last I checked in the cineplexes, the only Malay movie being played is Merong Mahawangsa. Anyway, I am curious :
1. How can you deny based on assumptions? Word of advice : the least you could do is pull a Chequbard - more apropriate I think..but bare in mind, a word from one cannot be used as a yardstick (pun unintended).
2. With all this denial, let me ask a hypothetical question - should this alleged person turns out to be really Anwar - after I don't know .. police investigation, Royal Commission, verifications from FBI, CIA, Scotland Yard and what-have-yous, will you admit you're wrong or will you call for more investigations and test of authenticity from the Martians, until all of us are extremely exhausted and couldn't give a f**k anymore..and decided to give some small island in the east coast for Anwar to govern?
2. Why the oh-so-sudden resurgence of fatwa and hadith with regards to adultery, slander and watching porn? Do not confuse politics and religion - they are two different things altogether.
3. How many married men, caught with their pants down screamed 'Yes! I did it'? Last I recall, Shaggy had a hit with 'it wasn't me' and was some sort of an anthem for promiscuous-adultery loving men (single/married/straight/crooked) worldwide...but hey, am not accusing Anwar for it after all he is allegedly caught.
4. Why must everything be linked/related/associated with BN/UMNO? You guys gave too much credit to them. It's overwhelming. They are not that creative, you know. After 12 years of relegating all blames to BN, you guys sounded very emasculated. Perhaps, not that I am an authority at this but, grow some balls or at least transplant some. The whole victim/weak/oppressed routine have a shelf life - and it's expiring sooner than you think.
Now, let me get back to my real porn and I shall wait in bated breath of your reply.
It is convenient for Thamby Chik not to admit the choolgirl's case. She bares a child and was forced to be compensated. This iswhat we Muslim Malysians are good at. We are sooo vindictive. I hope whe woman come up front to reveal herself for the sake of sanity and truth. Afterall she was suckered to receive for a mere RM5,000. Malaysians hope Thamby Chick will be striked by lightning.
Post a Comment