Tuesday, May 11, 2010

What Police Should Have Done The Day After.

Hantu Laut

Apology, it is exactly what the Police should have done after the fatal shooting of 15-year old Amirulrashid Amzah.Not be on the defensive and used bullying tactic to try snuff public outcry.

In my posting "Sorry, Is A Word Never Said Wrong" I epitomized first step the Police should have taken was to apologise to the boy's family for the fatal mistake. Saying sorry does not mean admitting liability which I reckon was the reason the Police refused to do.

The police should seriously consider employing a spokesman or spokesperson who is well-trained in people's skills and public relation.With a spokesman, mistakes made at his level, could be corrected later by the police top brass.

Whether the policeman responsible for the shooting is guilty of homicide is for the court to decide, neither the police nor the public.

Neville Spykerman of Malaysian Insider has given a good sequential actions that the Police should have taken after the tragic shooting.

Below is his take on what should have been done that would have saved the police the public hostility and odium.

Aminulrasyid and the police public relations disaster — Neville Spykerman

May 11, 2010

MAY 11 — The fatal shooting of Aminulrasyid Amzah is fast becoming a public relations disaster case-study-cum-manual for the police on how not to handle a crisis.

The manual for the brass should start with;

— Acknowledging mistakes from the word go

The 14-year-old schoolboy was shot dead in the back of the head. Pointing out that Aminulrasyid was out joyriding in his sister’s car is not going to mitigate the gravity of the tragedy or the culpability of the police.

— Apologise

Instead of issuing a sincere apology to the family for their loss, the police went on a public relations offensive. First by claiming they acted in self defence because the dead boy had attempted to reverse into them when the shots were fire and secondly that a parang was found in the car.

— Avoid demonising the victim

To add salt to the wounds of his family — Aminulrasyid and 15-year-old Azamuddin Omar, who was in the car with him, were initially labelled as criminals.

No efforts have been made by police to clear their names to the dismay of their families.

— Handling the expected public backlash professionally

Did the police really expect the public, media and politicians to lay back and swallow the “official version” of what transpired in the early morning of April 26?

Public outrage was only to be expected.

But again police decided the best defence is to go on the offence.

They issued what DAP’s Lim Kit Siang described as a “ham-fisted and unwarranted warning to politicians and public not to make statements or to speculate on the incident because it would further undermine public confidence in police integrity and professionalism”.

— Avoid portraying the police as the real victims in the tragedy

Tan Sri Musa Hassan threat “to call his men off the streets, if that is what the people want” following the public backlash was both self defeating besides portraying the cops as bullies who are unable to accept criticism.

The Inspector-General of Police demonstrated his inability to empathise with grief of the victim’s family and widespread public anger.

— Keeping the family informed

Is it really so difficult for the police to pick up the phone and inform Aminulrasyid’s family about the developments of the case?

Did it not cross the minds of police that they owed the family that much?

Or did they think it’s sufficient for Aminulrasyid’s family to learn that a police corporal was charged in court yesterday for his death by reading about it the press?

The death of Aminulrasyid is and will continue to be a stain on the uniforms of the men-in-blue as long as they choose to repeat these mistakes.

* Neville Spykerman is a senior reporter with The Malaysian Insider.

Now, that the police have identified the policeman and let justice to take its course, the public should stop making an issue out of it.

Let justice takes its course.

Monday, May 10, 2010

Women's Bitching Gives Home Minister A Headache.

HANTU LAUT

Most victims are women. What do women do? They go to the hairdressers ... they chit-chat and suddenly it is everywhere and cause people to fear,” Hishammuddin said.

The remark is not an insult to women it is an insult to Najib for appointing this kind of brain to his cabinet.This man has not, as far back as I can remember, since he was made a minister made any intelligible statement.He is what the Indonesian would say good at "homong-homong kosong".

People would accept if his brevity is the soul of wit.Unfortunately, he is not.There is nothing funny in what he says it is just a big void in his skull that incapacitated his judgement.No minister in his right mind would dare make such outrageously irrelevant statement.

As most women are victims of crime so he concluded that women's chit-chat are the cause of the rise in criminal activities and not because psychologically criminals tend to prey on the weaker sex, making them easy picking.

Was his remark the result of police survey given to him as Home minister that the rise in crime is attributed to women's relentless gossips and not due to police dismal performance or was it his own knee jerk reaction?

Such impertinence is an insult to the intelligentsia.No one holding public office should have the balls to resort to such rudimentary reasoning, let alone making it public.Even the Bocor MP's grabby angle sounds better than his skewed postulation.

If anyone were to be offended it would be the Prime Minister not the women in this country.

To downplay street crime to women’s idle chatter is infuriating and demeaning. Perhaps the minister needs to take a bus, walk to the shops and cross a street to understand how frightening it has become. For the record, most of us women cannot afford to go to the hairdresser,” said Women’s Aid Organisation’s executive director, Ivy Josiah.

You are too kind,Ivy.

I say, take a hike, Hishammudin.

Sunday, May 9, 2010

Charity Begins At Home

Hantu Laut

Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Nor Mohamad Yakcop says here Malays are lagging all over.Who's to blame, the Malays or Malay leaders?

Why are the Malays still lagging behind? Pure and simple, Malay leaders and rich Malays are not doing enough for their kin.

A good example is work of philanthropy which is almost absent in the rich Malay world.There are many rich Malays, most beneficiaries of the NEP, but how many of them you can count on your two hands are giving back to society, if not in general, at least to the less fortunate Malay community? There are some but the number is very negligible.

Why did I use philantropy as example?

Philantropy is the desire to promote the welfare of others particularly by giving one's best effort or money to the less fortunate without expecting any return.

Most of those that have amassed huge fortunes through hard work are more likely to give back to society rather than those who have acquired it through other means.

Did the government have a good policy to help the Malays? The NEP if confined to its noble objective is not a bad thing.It has become a bogeyman to the non-Malays not for its purposes but for its abuses.

Indeed, the government have a good policy, but as long as those in power uses it as a gravy train to enrich themselves and to keep them in power, not in a hundred years, would the Malays see a reversal of fortune favouring them.

Nor Yakcop can shout the next hundred years, nothing will change, unless Malay leaders stop providing lip service and start caring for each other.

A few rich Malays does not make all Malay rich.

Friday, May 7, 2010

Sibu Folks Remember Hadi Awang's Insult

Hantu Laut

What Hadi Awang said of the Dayaks during the Batang Ai by-elections last year is going to haunt Pakatan in Sibu. His statement below insulted the Dayak community.


b

Translated into English
. "All by-elections before this the results were in our favour, only in Batang Ai we lost because they do not understand how to vote, still in their loincloths.I don't mean to insult but only civilised places voted for PAS"

I think he meant Pakatan Rakyat.PAS can't stand in Batang Ai because it's not Muslim areas.

Does Lim Kit Siang expects the Dayaks to vote for DAP's candidate after the being insulted by Hadi, saying the Dayaks are pea-brained and still running around in loincloths meaning they are still primitive.

Only arrogant and racially and religiously bias politician would dare make such reckless and racially offensive statement.















Kit Siang campaigning on a plane on the way to Sibu.


Sibu, will it be payback time?

BN on the right track.