Tuesday, December 14, 2010

Wikileaks Never Mentioned Malaysian Special Branch As The Source

M'sia ex deputy PM Anwar Ibrahim 'did commit sodomy' - WikiLeaks

Singapore's intelligence services as well as its minister mentor Lee Kuan Yew believe that opposition leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim "did indeed commit the acts for which he is currently indicted".

This was revealed by WikiLeaks through a release of a US State Department cable issued in Nov 2008.
The cable was exclusively released to the Australian tabloid, The Sun-Herald, and was widely reported by other Australian newspapers yesterday.

WikiLeaks is a website that publishes anonymous submissions and leaks of sensitive governmental, corporate, organisational or religious documents, while attempting to preserve the anonymity and untraceability of its contributors.

The US State Department cable that dealt with Anwar's sodomy case, dated Nov 2008, and was released exclusively to The Sun-Herald by WikiLeaks, had stated: "The Australians said that Singapore's intelligence services and (Singapore elder statesman) Lee Kuan Yew had told Australia's Office of National Assessments (ONA) in their exchanges that opposition leader Anwar 'did indeed commit the acts for which he is currently indicted'."
In the newspaper report, it said the document stated that the Singaporeans told ONA that they made this assessment on the basis of "technical intelligence", which was likely to relate to intercepted communications.

In a posting on Twitter yesterday, Anwar denied the allegations.

Hantu Laut's comment.

(Anwar was quick to jump the gun and blamed the Malaysian Special Branch for the exposure, which was never mentioned in Wikileaks released documents.It mentioned "technical intelligence" related to intercepted communication" and former Singapore Premier Lee Kuan Yew's assertion with ONA (Australia's Office of National Assessment) about Anwar's indiscretion.

When you are going to be the next prime minister of a nation you wouldn't know who is interested in your extracurricular activities and putting you under surveillance.

Most Western nations have their sleuth-hounds all over the place tracking world leaders and would-be world leaders.

Singapore, have all the reasons for sleuthing on our leaders, their peaceful future and co-existence rest on level-headed leaders running the country.

Also read Raja Petra's "Why I am A Loose Cannon"

Hantu Laut does not necessary endorse their views.


Anonymous said...

hang pon dah tau perangai depa ni..apa-apa pon depa akan pusing..pusing...dan pusing..samapi last sekali depa yang pening..lantak pi kat depa...rakyat tak semuanya 'ngong macam depa puak-puak tu..

Anonymous said...

" Singapore's intelligence services as well as its minister mentor Lee Kuan Yew believe that opposition leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim "did indeed commit the acts for which he is currently indicted."

Hantu, where is the evidence that he did commit the act. You didn't or forgot to mention that LKY also said, ' it was a sex trap and Anwar walked into it'.

They concluded that it was a sex trap based, presumably on intercepted telephone conversations between Najib, Rodwan, then CPO Melaka, Saiful and Musa Hasan. I guess by now they must have a transcript of those tele-conversations for LKY to explicitly come to the conclusion that it was a sex trap.

Do you think in an entrapment case, the trap officers led by Rodwan would allow Saiful to enter the apartment just carrying his bare arsehole to be buggerd by Anwar. Rodwan would have supplied Saiful with devices attached to his body or to be planted in the apartment for the trap party to listen to every conversation between Saiful and Anwar and to view what transpired in it. Saiful could have stripped himself and coached by Rodwan to say the correct things to Anwar like, 'Boss, I know you like arsehole. Do you want a go at me'. Anwar could have said if indeed sodomy had occurred, ' Why not, go inside the room while I finish my work. I'll be there in a few minutes'. These conversations would have been captured by audio or other devices for the hearing of the trap party. It is damning evidences against if it indeed occurred. The 'acts' would have been secretly recorded on video for the benefit of the raiding party. Even in an ambush situation, the MCA snoop squad can successfully get a video recording of Chuah Soi Lek in action, what more in an entrapement case where you have a willing 'baiter'.

Anonymous said...

LKY said all those things in 2008 when the trial had not commenced. He knew from his intelligence sources that it was a sex trap and concluded that the Malaysian SB or trap party must have the evidences of the 'act'. Ask him now whether he still hold on to his opinion after the world had heard Saiful and the prosecution evidence in crt. Not one audio or video recording of what happened in the room was produced as evidences to support Saifuls testimony. Do you think for a moment that he would not shit for 2 days if sodomy had indeed occurred when it is a sex trap and the trap party led by Rodwan monitors his every movement.

Hantu, in the absence of audio and video evidence what happened in the room is pure conjecture and a figment of one's imagination unless you had been there. LKY relied on the M'sian SB to conclude that Anwar buggerred Saiful. Where is the hard cold evidence considering that the S'pore SB had confirmed that it was a sex trap.

You shld not be naive lah. Of course wikileak did not mention M'sian SB as the source. They intercepted the American cable whose sources were S'pore and Australia. But where S'pore got their intelligence, would Wikileak know; it must definitely be from M/SB. Ask LKY where he got his evidence to conclude Anwar buggered Saiful or does he based it on some ' technical intelligence' of his own SB's collection. If that is the case

Anonymous said...

I am just wondering if wikileak is taken is correct for now, what if they leak expose of our PM?


Anonymous said...

ASSuming or is it ARSEuming that it is really a sex trap, the fact that BABI buggered Saifuls arsehole, makes it ok because it is a trap?

Kunyit Hangit

Anonymous said...


Spot on, I am waiting for that part to be exposed, and by then, would we be reading the same kind of rhetoric from all these people ?

It would be very interesting indeed !

Well, I personally do not think I will be embarrassed by it because I have long been immune.