Saturday, September 15, 2012

Homosexuality: Nature Or Nurture?

Hantu Laut

It is the most shocking, unfounded, misinformed and convoluted finding of a bunch of amateurish sociobiologists.

The Education Dept crass guideline on how to identify homosexuals is a complete sham.  

It's sending wrong signals to young and unadulterated minds of children who follow blindly the stupid description that can do more harm than good, stigmatised anyone fitting the description.

The moron who designates such ridiculous prescription should be hung by the balls.

Read the quack's design  here  on how to spot a homosexual!

Are we teaching and promoting hate crime?

Homosexuality, as we all know, is as old as the oldest profession and since ancient time have been contentious issues in society. 

There are two schools of thought on homosexualities. Are they innate or natural, which means existing in some people since birth that make sexual orientation not a choice, or are they unnatural and a matter of conditioning and a matter of choice?

Many still hold the view that homosexuality, like all social habits, is a matter of choice.

Do you hold that view or are you one of those who believe it is nature that plays greater role in the making of a homosexual person? 

Read the article below 

Homosexuality:Nature or Nurture ?

Although the term is new, discussions about sexuality in general, and same-sex attraction in particular, have occasioned philosophical discussion ranging from Plato’s Symposium. However, we still cannot say for sure whether homosexuality, and hence also heterosexuality and bisexuality, is socially constructed or purely driven by biological forces.

 Many homosexuals argue that they have not chosen their condition, but that they were born that way. It is making homosexual behavior natural for them. However, because something was not chosen does not mean it was inborn. Some desires are acquired or strengthened by habituation and conditioning instead of by conscious choice of some person. For example, no one chooses to be an alcoholic, but one can become habituated to alcohol, so just as one can acquire alcoholic desires without consciously choosing them, so one may acquire homosexual desires, by engaging in homosexual fantasies or behavior.Read more.


Anonymous said...

Tu lah tahap mentality professor, guru Dan penjawat awam kat Kementerian Pendidikan.

Tambah lagi ler, simptom berikut kalau nak tambah-tambah.

1. Memakai jam Omega?

2. Kepala licin?

3. Watak lembut atau badan macam Malik?

4. Asyik suka cerita-cerita sodomi?

5. Isteri kalau ada gemuk- gemuk?

6. Asyik suka baca Utusan?

7. ...........................

Anonymous said...

Tambah lagi:

1. Kelulusan asrama penuh lelaki atau perempuan?

2. Suara lembut saje atau suara kuat bergegar?

3. Suka pegang benda-benda tajam atau merbahayakan melambangkan kejantinan?

4. Suka beraksi menunjuk buntut?

5. Kuat bermain isteri punya buntut?

6. Selalunya berbangsa Arab, ....?

7. Bibir licin dan berwarna ...?

8. Suka guna tangan dan jari-jari menunjuk-nunjuk aksi seks?

9. Dah tua-tua tapi masih bujang atau duda?

10. Suka bermain cat merah?

Anonymous said...

Seriously, it can be both. Its well documented in nature that animals have shown such instinct.

abdooss said...

That's life under BN.

How about PR? A very wise old man said they are "Angels you don't know."

It's your pick.

Purple Haze said...

I personally know of a pair of twins, who are now in their 40s, one of whom is straight and the other is gay.

Their genetic makeup is the same, I would think which would debunk the "nature" school of thought but the nature vs nurture argument remains divided in the psychological sphere.