Hantu Laut
Will Barack Obama bomb the hell out of Syria?
Obama should return the Nobel Peach Prize as he is no more fighting a leftover war, but himself into war.
He never did deserve the Nobel Peace Prize anyway. I have written here some time ago why he didn't deserve the Nobel Prize.
He says America is not the world's policeman, why than is he trying to get involve in an area of conflict that has nothing to do with the U.S?
The American never seem to learn their lessons, poking their noses in every area of conflicts whenever they think American interests are at stake.
Syria, for no viable reason, do not fit the picture of danger to American interests, but there is more to it than chemical weapon of mass destruction to justify U.S involvement.
The Syrian war if left unchecked can destabilise the region.
That's the only reason the U.S. wanted to exert its military power in Syria......... to shield Israel and protect the oil fields of Saudi Arabia from a spill over of the war, where a motley mix of dangerous rebels forces, including Al Qaeda are fighting to topple Bashar al-Assad.
More than 100,000 people have been killed and 1.7 million forced to flee to neighbouring countries since the conflict started 30 months ago.
The U.S. have closed its eyes to what had happened in Cambodia, Bosnia and Rwanda where millions were slaughtered by murderous dictators and the American never bat an eyelid.
Why than is the U.S. keen to get involved in Syria?
Why Syria, where Assad is fighting rebel groups as atrocious, cruel and murderous as Assad is ?
The Middle East is the most important region for the U.S and for the security of Israel and the oil fields of Saudi Arabia.
The U.S. doesn't give two hoots about human lives. If sincerely so, why wait until over 100,000 lives have been lost before it triggers the American conscience.
Obama says if they do proceed, it will be limited war, no ground troops.
Aren't aerial bombings the most destructive to human lives and properties and more often than not do not hit the intended targets, resulting in gross destruction to civilian lives and properties?
How many people have Assad killed using chemical weapons and how many more will Obama kill with his indiscriminate bombing of the country?
I am no fan of Assad, I think he is reincarnation of the devil itself and should be taken out, but not the way the American want to do it.
The American with all the sophisticated weapons that they have are not known to be dead accurate hitting their targets and many civilians would become collateral damage if the U.S.military resorted to aerial bombings using drones or manned flights.
The rebels atrocities and cruelty are not less than what Assad is doing. Can Obama explain to the world his reasoning of supporting the same kind of evil that he is trying to stop, this war of baddies against baddies.
The video below was smuggled by a rebel disillusioned with the atrocities inflict on the enemies and civilians who do not support their cause.
Rebels have also reportedly killed 123 civilians in Assad's home province of Latakia and Assad's Alawite sect that controlled the military and have kept his family in power for over four decades. The massacre could have been retaliatory.
Among the rebels are opportunistic terror groups like Al Qeada and freedom fighters from other Muslim countries.
America's next biggest headache is if the rebels succeeded in taking over Syria, there are no visible leaders align to the U.S. who can take over the running of the country.
Between the two evils, which one is Obama going to play ball with?
Obama is now looking for an escape tunnel where he can escape from attacking Syria.
Will Barack Obama bomb the hell out of Syria?
Obama should return the Nobel Peach Prize as he is no more fighting a leftover war, but himself into war.
He never did deserve the Nobel Peace Prize anyway. I have written here some time ago why he didn't deserve the Nobel Prize.
He says America is not the world's policeman, why than is he trying to get involve in an area of conflict that has nothing to do with the U.S?
The American never seem to learn their lessons, poking their noses in every area of conflicts whenever they think American interests are at stake.
Syria, for no viable reason, do not fit the picture of danger to American interests, but there is more to it than chemical weapon of mass destruction to justify U.S involvement.
The Syrian war if left unchecked can destabilise the region.
That's the only reason the U.S. wanted to exert its military power in Syria......... to shield Israel and protect the oil fields of Saudi Arabia from a spill over of the war, where a motley mix of dangerous rebels forces, including Al Qaeda are fighting to topple Bashar al-Assad.
More than 100,000 people have been killed and 1.7 million forced to flee to neighbouring countries since the conflict started 30 months ago.
Why than is the U.S. keen to get involved in Syria?
The Middle East is the most important region for the U.S and for the security of Israel and the oil fields of Saudi Arabia.
The U.S. doesn't give two hoots about human lives. If sincerely so, why wait until over 100,000 lives have been lost before it triggers the American conscience.
Obama says if they do proceed, it will be limited war, no ground troops.
Aren't aerial bombings the most destructive to human lives and properties and more often than not do not hit the intended targets, resulting in gross destruction to civilian lives and properties?
How many people have Assad killed using chemical weapons and how many more will Obama kill with his indiscriminate bombing of the country?
I am no fan of Assad, I think he is reincarnation of the devil itself and should be taken out, but not the way the American want to do it.
The American with all the sophisticated weapons that they have are not known to be dead accurate hitting their targets and many civilians would become collateral damage if the U.S.military resorted to aerial bombings using drones or manned flights.
The rebels atrocities and cruelty are not less than what Assad is doing. Can Obama explain to the world his reasoning of supporting the same kind of evil that he is trying to stop, this war of baddies against baddies.
The video below was smuggled by a rebel disillusioned with the atrocities inflict on the enemies and civilians who do not support their cause.
Rebels have also reportedly killed 123 civilians in Assad's home province of Latakia and Assad's Alawite sect that controlled the military and have kept his family in power for over four decades. The massacre could have been retaliatory.
Among the rebels are opportunistic terror groups like Al Qeada and freedom fighters from other Muslim countries.
America's next biggest headache is if the rebels succeeded in taking over Syria, there are no visible leaders align to the U.S. who can take over the running of the country.
Between the two evils, which one is Obama going to play ball with?
Obama is now looking for an escape tunnel where he can escape from attacking Syria.
No comments:
Post a Comment