Muslims Outrage:The Film That Killed US Ambassador To Libya

Hantu Laut

I was shocked and speechless watching such derogatory and demeaning portrayal of our Prophet Muhammad (SAW).

It's just too bad they killed an innocent man, the US Ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens and three other US officials for the sins of his fellow American.

Islam and Muslims can't and will not accept or tolerate any form of desecration of the prophet. A plight that the U.S government knew but refused to accept instead putting American supremacy ahead in its foreign relation dealing with Islamic countries. 

The might is right attitude of the U.S is the root cause of the turmoil with Muslims throughout the world.

That's the price you have to pay for ignorance, arrogance and stupidity.

What are the American government going to do? 

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Are they just going to let the provocateurs who made the film go scot free and let Muslim outrage spread throughout the world and endanger more American lives?

They would claim it's freedom of expression and nothing they can do.

This is America, land of the free, where bigots, sectarians and racists roam free. 

Below is the controversial film and most unfair portrayal of Prophet Muhammad (SAW) and Islam.

Warning: Readers discretion required.Not for the faint hearted.



Malaysians, beware of too much freedom! 

You'll get this kind of dastardly act of not respecting other people's religion.

Read here a letter from concerned Muslims in Malaysia

Read My Lips You Fuckheads! It's Pro-Pakatan Blog Insulting Sabahans

Hantu Laut


I could not believe myself reading the denial by Wan Azizah and Rafizi Ramli who says that it is an UMNO blog attempting to show Pakatan is at odds with Sabah people.

Wan Azizah, firstly, my apology and respect to you as a lady, but that assumption is a lot of craps ! Why don't you do some investigation first before you open you big mouth and embarrass yourself.

Well, Sabahans should know by now where their votes should not go to. 

Though I am a Muslim, I have Dusun blood and I am offended by such tactless and uncivilised manner of some West Malaysians, who have some serious chips on their shoulders, uncouth and uneducated. You don't criticise other people's culture or religion, it's politically incorrect. 

Obviously, poor upbringing...... kurang ajar dan biadap. 

Wan Azizah, Rafizi and the rest of the Pakatan's clowns can keep denying the blog has nothing to do with them, which may be true, but it is still a pro-Pakatan blog. Nobody say the blog is licenced by Pakatan, but it is certainly supporting the Pakatan's political agenda. 

There are hundreds of independent pro-Pakatan, pro-UMNO and pro-BN blogs that share the same political ideology and are outside the control of the party, doing what in legal term called a pro bono.

You can't run away from the truth, the blog is not brand new, it has been around for over a year, the archives are full of pro-Pakatan stuffs. The blog is here.

Read here more insults on Sabahans from this pro-Pakatan blog.

Take your pick, who are the chronic liars?

The blog also idolised Pakatan leaders:

Pemimpin paling suci! Hahahah!

Rumours abound that this "Cacak Kubin" is coming to Sabah today to steal some more greedy Sabah MPs. SUCI konon!

Hudud! Over my dead body Bayyi!

The legal soceress !

If you ran out of excuse just blame UMNO.

I rest my case.

Suaram Is A De Facto Political Party

Hantu   Laut

Whatever arguments put forth by Ambiga and the key personnels of Suaram will not change the fact that Suaram has lost its role and credibility as a legitimate human rights movement. For all, intents and purposes, it is a de facto political party with the paramount objective of unseating the government. Majority of its office bearers are members of opposition parties. 

The ROS declared here that Suaram had never applied for registration with the ROS.

Has Suaram openly declared its sources of funding? Aren't they cloaked in secrecy until investigation throws open the door ?

No country would allow an organisation dabbling in politics to be funded by foreign countries, friendly or otherwise.

Since Suaram is actively pursuing a political expedition, its funding should be under the microscope. It has already cheated by circumventing the law, projecting itself as an association when it is not.It is a corporation.

Political funding have always been under scrutiny in many countries and developed countries have regulations to control the flow. Such law is necessary so that democracy would not become a mockery when a government come under the influence and control of a handful of people.

In Britain there were growing concerns that the largest British political parties received donations from a handful of wealthy donors. In 2000 the PPERA (Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000) was passed in parliament to establish an Electoral Commission that require all political parties to register with it, setting down accounting requirement and control of donations to political parties.

In 2008 the British Minister of Justice released a white paper that proposed to tighten controls over spending by parties and candidates, strengthen the powers of the Electoral Commission, and increase transparency of donations.

If the British government can curtail domestic donations can you imagine if any of Britain's political party received donations, say, from China or Russia without public disclosure. Don't you think all hell would break lose and there would be Scotland Yard running all over the place raiding the party headquarters and sealing it off from further access to party officials?

Suaram, by any stretch of one's imagination, is not apolitical NGO doing noble work for the destitute poor or any worthwhile charity for that matter. It has become countenance to the political aspiration of the opposition parties in the country. I am pretty sure the authority will find more skeletons in the closet if they dig deeper into the clandestine activities of this so-called NGO.

First and foremost, Suaram had broken the law by using a private limited company masquerading as an association and collecting unauthorised donations from foreign sources.

The Malaysian  government is too lenient, sterner action should be taken against its key personnels. 

Who gives a damn what the law in the West says, it is the law of this land that matters and should prevail and be respected.As they say "When in Rome do as the Romans do".

As you sow, so you shall reap, for those in Suaram, you break the law, you face the music.



Who is Ambiga trying to fool?

Ambiga is trying to fool the hapless Malaysian dummies with her  " I am a lawyer I know better", including shoving something preposterous down your throat like those ugly French farmers who forced feed their geese to get their 'pate de foie gras'. She considers Malaysians as trash receptacles and have the innate propensity to treat them as such.

The photo above is of clueless Malaysians in London protesting over William and Kate visit to Sabah, incited by Ambiga and Suaram. 

The British government refused to bow to pressure by the British media to stop the visit using the adage "innocent until proven guilty" of the opposition's political chicanery on Musa Aman. The opposition is going full force to try embarrass the Najib's government. 

To think that people who gives money for free have no hidden agenda is wishful thinking. Ambiga and her Suaram nitwits can say so but most, if not all, political funding, have strings attached and in the case of contributions from foreign governments they have long-term agenda to use such entity for their political or economic agenda. It is called "influence peddling"

Influence peddling is illegal in the U.S. A number of political figures have been sent to prison  for influence peddling.

That's why most political funding come from interest groups, whether individuals, companies or trade unions, they all have only one motive, to push through their own agenda making use of the people they funded.

Suaram, can bark as loud as they wish in that they are right in what they do and as in the words of Ambiga being persecuted by Najib's government, but the fact remained that they have absolutely no defence of their political stance and Suaram's extension as the wing of Pakatan Rakayat or rather as Anwar's PKR hound dog.

Funding the investigation of the submarine deals in France is absolutely political in nature. It stinks to high heaven of political excursion.

True or not, the idea is to link the money back to Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak, to demonise him, his party and government for the sake of Pakatan Rakyat. 

Amiga! That, they don't teach you at law school !

You may be a smart lawyer but a lousy politician.

Anwar's Gun Happy Bodyguard:A Picture Paints A Thousand Words

Hantu Laut

Anwar's declining popularity have made him desperately seeking to resuscitate his tattered image. He has started campaigning before dissolution of Parliament.

Anwar's hammy theatre is back. 

From being poisoned, seeking refuge in the Turkish Embassy for fear of assassination, to his car tampered with to kill him and death threats to him and members of his family, he has a script that would make a blockbuster movie in Never Never Land and J.M Barrie's Oscar for best actor in a leading role.

As usual, his modus operandi, if people don't want him in their kampong, blame it on UMNO.

Leadership by example. A man with a boss who shows no respect for the law, would act in the same way.

Watch the video and photo below of his trigger happy Joe, courtesy of Rocky Bru and Jiwa Paradox.

A picture paints a thousand words. 

There is sufficient evidence to show that his bodyguard has acted beyond his line of duty. 

Anwar was never in any imminent danger! 

Read PKR seeks to meet IGP over political gangsterism

Who is the gangster, the man with the gun, or the unarmed bystanders ?